kelly_chambliss (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
kelly_chambliss) wrote2012-05-24 11:54 am
kelly_chambliss) wrote2012-05-24 11:54 am
Deep Thoughts
Stolen from the ultra-cool pale_moonlite. It's a problematic quiz, of course -- filled with spelling and other errors and with overly-schematic categories. But fun, like all these things. (There's no such thing as a "purely objective" language.)
pale_moonlite. It's a problematic quiz, of course -- filled with spelling and other errors and with overly-schematic categories. But fun, like all these things. (There's no such thing as a "purely objective" language.)| Which philosopher are you? Your Result: Early Wittgenstein / Positivists The ambiguity of language is the cause for most (if not all) philosophical problems. If we could get a purely objective language all philosophical problems would be solved. Q.E.D. | |
| Aristotle | |
| Nietzsche | |
| W.v.O. Quine / Late Wittgenstein | |
| Plato (strict rationalists) | |
| Immanuel Kant | |
| Sartre/Camus (late existentialists) | |
| Which philosopher are you? Quiz Created on GoToQuiz | |
no subject
In college, I knew a very serious, solemn, un-ironic guy who spent his weekends writing an "existentialist murder mystery" -- in which, he said, no one really died because no one really exists.
no subject